User talk:Majorly/RfA
Your EN Nom history
[edit]Hey Majorly, is there a reason why you haven't listed any RfA's since Feb 08? I can think of at least one where you were a nom and I thought there were others.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 21:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- There's only two I can find: this and this, which are perhaps two of the worst RfAs in Wikipedia's history. Not because the candidates were bad, but because of the behaviour of some of the participants, which was some of the nastiest I have seen. It put me off nominating people, that's for sure. Majorly talk 22:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- NO, I think I will forever hold the distinction for the worst RfA in WP's history... but yeah, the second one was the one that I remembered. I have no problem with your not posting them, but I think that you should either remove them all or make some statement to the effect that there were two others that you are not posting for privacy's sake or something. Otherwise, it gives an incomplete picture. But it's your page, so I'm not going be overly concerned.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC) EDIT: I do, however, have a concern with the "TOTAL" at the bottom. If you choose not to include some RfA's that fine, but the total implies that this is all of them... when in fact it isn't. How about adding something like, "There were two other RfA's that failed, but due to the tone and concerns for privacy, I choose not to list them."---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- That has nothing to do with this. It's simply not update because I haven't been bothered. If it concerns you, feel free to update it yourself. I should note, for example, I have nominated people on Meta-Wiki since then as well. This is simply a case of me just not caring. But as I say, it's a wiki - please feel free to update it yourself. Majorly talk 23:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Now that's an answer I can appreciate ;-)---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 05:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- That has nothing to do with this. It's simply not update because I haven't been bothered. If it concerns you, feel free to update it yourself. I should note, for example, I have nominated people on Meta-Wiki since then as well. This is simply a case of me just not caring. But as I say, it's a wiki - please feel free to update it yourself. Majorly talk 23:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- NO, I think I will forever hold the distinction for the worst RfA in WP's history... but yeah, the second one was the one that I remembered. I have no problem with your not posting them, but I think that you should either remove them all or make some statement to the effect that there were two others that you are not posting for privacy's sake or something. Otherwise, it gives an incomplete picture. But it's your page, so I'm not going be overly concerned.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC) EDIT: I do, however, have a concern with the "TOTAL" at the bottom. If you choose not to include some RfA's that fine, but the total implies that this is all of them... when in fact it isn't. How about adding something like, "There were two other RfA's that failed, but due to the tone and concerns for privacy, I choose not to list them."---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)