Jump to content

User talk:Malfunction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Egr sockpuppets

[edit]

Dear Egr/Malfunction/Maxcap/BabuBhatt, rap-core is rap with hardcore guitars. John Amber 22:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Lucpol/Szpaner/Amber/Schwarc, do you wanna definitely understand that Malfunction, Maxcap and Babubhatt are NOT my sockpuppets? Rapcore is rock/metal/punk with rapped vocals, NOT hip hop with rock guitars (and everyone but you knows it). If it was so, we could talk about a non-existent genre which merges hip hop beats and rock/metal/punk vocals. And you stop throwing false accuses against me and other users.

-- Egr (talk), 9/8/2006

P.S:Malfunction, I'm sorry for using your talk page.

RCU

[edit]

I thought you might like to know that LUCPOL submitted your name with a list of what he believes to be sockpuppets to WP:RCU, here. --Wildnox 23:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Pilotguy (ptt) 18:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:194.144.111.210, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac 16:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on List of thrash metal bands. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Heimstern Läufer 22:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 11, 2007

[edit]
Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Fair Deal 00:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

[edit]

Regarding user talk pages, it is best to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this at Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages is often interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil. For this reason, if your deletion of notices and concerns on your user talk page is to keep the "clutter" down, I suggest that you instead create archives for these messages. --Geniac 13:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Khoikhoi 02:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indef block

[edit]

I have blocked this account indefinitely, for the 3rd 3RR violation in 2 weeks. Going through the contribs I see almost pure disruption and abuse. Crum375 03:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]