Jump to content

User talk:Mambo420

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Mambo420, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Polytechnic Institute of New York University

[edit]

Thanks for all your contributions to this article and the other NYU pages. I did notice that you moved the Polytechnic Institute of New York University to a different name. The article name should always be the full official name of the subject and your move changed that. I moved the page back; if you disagree please discuss it on the article talk page. Thanks! --Mblumber (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Citation Barnstar
Thanks for all your hard work cleaning up the alumni on Polytechnic Institute of New York University. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have restlessly made constructive edits and received award/barnstar from an administrator for my hard work. I have received applaud from other editors. I have flawless history. I am a WP:MEAT, who engaged in meatpuppetry unwittingly, on the assumption that it is an acceptable practice.

Decline reason:

That's not a good reason for unblocking. Looks to me like a case of WP:DUCK with socks. Peridon (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I never engaged in disruptive editing. Is there any way that I can get unblocked?

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By its very definition WP:MEAT is disruptive editing ... care to rephrase? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me. I made over 450 constructive edits and 0 destructive edits. If you ever see me doing unconstructive editing then block me forever. I won't say a word. The real sockpuppet was my former girlfriend who is still editing Wiki under new names(one of which was bimbo420).

Decline reason:

you are a proven sockpuppet, and will not be unblocked under any circumstance.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked wrongfully. Someone please review my case again.... maybe the admin who gave me the barnstar above--Mambo420 (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looks very plausible behaviorially. To prevent you from wasting more of our time, talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 09:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Please try to understand that I use the University's computer. Many people use that computer. I made over 500 constructive edits, how can I be a disruptive editor? Besides, if I really wanted to create socks, then why would I even care to get this account unblocked... People just don't understand--Mambo420 (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]