User talk:Maram ahmari

October 2022

Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you recently removed content from Medina without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. S0091 (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Maram ahmari! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Medina several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Medina, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Maram ahmari, you edit summary just states "correct" which offers no explanation as to why you dispute the content which accurately describes what the cited reliable source states. Please start a discussion at Talk:Medina to provide your reasoning and gain consensus for your removal. S0091 (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please stop reinstating your edits at Medina; you will simply be reverted and eventually blocked. You cannot brute-force your way into changing Wikipedia by sheer number of edits – no-one can, no matter their belief system.—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 22:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Removal of referenced information

I will not revert you again within twenty-four hours, as I don't want to edit war, but you have removed referenced information. Wikipedia works on ”verifiability, not truth” as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability.” Please restore the referenced information. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit Warring

It is clear now that you want to get your way on Wikipedia, despite the fact that you have removed referenced information merely because you disagree with it. I urge you please to reflect on your behaviour, which violates Wikipedia policies. If you feel strongly that the information is incorrect, despite it being referenced, and you would like other editors to look into this, take it to the talk page.

I repeat: what you are currently doing goes against Wikipedia edit war rules. I worry that you may have already broken the three-revert rule, and I certainly do not want to do so by reverting you again today. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Between the 12th and 13th, 3RR was explicitly broken, and the slow-boil edit war has only continued since then. This is extremely problematic editing. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

April 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mecca, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 04:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mecca. General Ization ^Talk 04:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv 04:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mecca. CodeTalker (talk) 19:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv 20:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)