User talk:Marcadams99

Regarding your edits to United American Committee:

Your recent edit to United American Committee (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 07:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Israel, you will be blocked from editing. okedem 14:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jew, you will be blocked from editing.

At what point are these ridiculous edits going to be seen as what they are instead of foolishly assumed to be "good faith"? Stusutcliffe 19:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ZioPedia

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article ZioPedia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. JavaTenor 07:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ZioPedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:ZioPedia. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Bsherr 05:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel, you may be blocked from editing. GabrielF (talk) 02:23, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandilizing

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Israel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Gamaliel (talk) 05:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]