User talk:Marsadams

Speedy deletion of Wildscaper

A tag has been placed on Wildscaper, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Would like to document the history of WildScaper and it's development over the years.Marsadams (talk) 13:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wildscaper

A tag has been placed on Wildscaper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wildscaper

I have nominated Wildscaper, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildscaper. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you show how Wildscaper meets Wikipedia's notability guideline? If I've missed something, I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination, but generally a piece of software having a very narrow or specific focus that makes it unique isn't enough to meet our definition of "notable". Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC).

My talk page is probably not the best place to discuss this issue, the best venue would probably be the AfD discussion itself. However, I feel that if it is "difficult to define it as notable", then getting it through is going to be difficult. This is not a judgement on the quality of Wildscaper itself (I'm sure it's quite good), but simply put, if people are not talking about it, then it's probably not appropriate for an article, no matter how good it is. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC).