User talk:Marsbartastic

January 2024

Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you recently removed content from Michael Pucci without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nobody (talk) 13:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was changed as it is false information. I am Michael Pucci’s Daughter andI know my father. Marsbartastic (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marsbartastic The sentence you tried to add is already in the articles Personal life sections no need to add it twice. If you are his daughter then have a read at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, especially #COI_editing. About the bullying sentence: There are sources [1] of it so you need to prove that it's not true. Nobody (talk) 13:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marsbartastic! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Michael Pucci several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Michael Pucci, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Marsbartastic. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Michael Pucci, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -REDACTED403 (talk) 13:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to put correct information Marsbartastic (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Michael Pucci) for persistant WP:COI editing and WP:SOCKING.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you got hit by robots

The contentious material at Michael Pucci is a breach of our biographies of living people policy in that the sources used were inadequate. It is good and proper practice to remove such material immediately. However, by not using an edit summary to explain your reasons, and not raising a discussion on the talk page, your changes were seen as vandalism and reverted by a robot account. When you raised the relationship issue as a reason for removing the material as incorrect, this was (correctly) viewed as a conflict of interest.

It looks to me that your inexperience on Wikipedia, particularly in the sometimes arcane processes we use, has caused a problem. There are numerous help resources on Wipikedia, such as The Teahouse. Just ask! --Pete (talk) 11:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]