User talk:Martin Machelivich

May 2022

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that in this edit to Arsen Pavlov, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 13:37, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Arsen Pavlov. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Machelivch is Vasily Prozorov a Russian Propagandist

Martin Machelivich aka Vasily Prozorov is simply an ex SBU officer, wanted in Ukraine for espionage since 2018. He has long been trying to establish himself as a credible source of information. He is attempting to add a "face" as a poster for an enemy that does not exist & hijack a number of Wikipedia entries as well as create a page based on gossips and his hope to establish a credible reference point for himself. JJ Cunning (talk) 23:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In not hijacking anything, if you would like to delete the source material, then do such .

It's a credible source for information until the article gets accepted, being we can't use millions of tweets. All defamation of him can be removed -After-

Any real contributions other than just removing the page, would be acceptable.

Thanks. Martin Machelivich (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has a strict policy regarding Vandalism, hijacking the integrity of the site for self promotion and tabloid gossip.

Every claim made whether in draft, talk or as contribution needs to be cited to a reliable source especially with Biographies & mentioning names of living persons.

Not one source falls within the guidelines, nor does any contributions made. Repeated Disruptive behavior which extends to unsourced or poorly sourced citations should be removed immediately and without discussion when pertaining to living persons.

Furthermore, your acknowledgement of intent of defamation while having no value of contribution to Wikipedia per guidelines hoping it is accepted is cause for speedy removal.

JJ Cunning (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Blablubbs (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]