User talk:Mathematical.Analysis
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/HelpPage_IconPack-03.png)
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/HelpPage_IconPack-05.png)
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 10:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm JayBeeEll. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Lagrange_inversion_theorem that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JBL (talk) 23:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi Mathematical.Analysis! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Lagrange_inversion_theorem several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Lagrange inversion theorem, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. JBL (talk) 23:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Good formalist. Have fun as you want in your ignorance. Mathematical.Analysis (talk) 23:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC)