User talk:MattJames36

June 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Munroe Bergdorf. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 00:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Gender identity and respect Bergdorf's clearer stated preference in pronouns. Thank you, Railfan23 (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ash Sarkar, you may be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]