User talk:MattanJohnson11

Please only use a single account

On the basis of your user name and editing, it seems likely that this account is being operated by the same person as the User:AGNESVADASZ43 account. Please do not use multiple accounts to edit articles, especially when your changes are being reverted. Please read the guidance on this issue at Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC) Thank you. You should not change my edits. What I edited is true.MattanJohnson11 (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you are likely aware from your other account(s), there is currently a discussion of the infobox at Talk:Pacific War#Infobox (March 2019). Please gain consensus for your proposed changes. You will likely be blocked if this edit warring and abuse of multiple accounts continues. Nick-D (talk) 04:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Baltic region, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Northwestern Europe. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Pacific War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
As noted above, there is currently a discussion of the infobox. Please join it rather than edit war. This is your final warning. Nick-D (talk) 00:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pacific War, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Nick-D (talk) 03:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]