User talk:Matthew K Sharp

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of ECW500 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to RD Reynolds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DX927 (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to RD Reynolds. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DX927 (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking and sockpuppets[edit]

Okay, yes I DID vandalize the RD Reynolds article. Twice. But I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. I could understand blocking because of vandalism sure, but because of sockpuppetry? Who is this peripirus or whoever person who did this? Surely that is abuse of blocking power? Also this "DX97" is quite clearly a vandal him/her self. Again, if I have been blocked because and only because I vandalized an article, I can accept that. But this "sockpuppet" stuff is unfounded. Could these two people (the blocker, and the one who tagged me) actually state their case without just being smug and rash? Matthew K Sharp (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to be neither smug nor rash. This is not your first account here, not your first to vandalise the RD Reynolds article and not even the first you have used in the past week. The sockpuppet tag is clearly correct and appropriate - Peripitus (Talk) 11:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]