User talk:Maxxdesignvc

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Alessio Bidoli for disruptive editing. You may still edit the rest of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black Kite (talk) Alessio Bidoli himself wants to delete this page and that I rebuild it below his instructions. If you do not agree with this, please contact him directly: alessio.bidoli@icloud.com Maxxdesignvc (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Black Kite (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I found really too verbose the Wikipedia policy. Indeed I wanted only to have that code inserted in the Alessio Bidoli's biograghy (as webmaster I can manage the text formatting, otherwise normal people I think is not able to write in the bit complicated Wikipedia's coding!) as requested from violinist himself (with the correct content officially translated and approved!), otherwise the question remains to obscure the English biograpghy, because in his point of view, Alessio Bidoli, finds is not compliant with the real biographic data. So if someone like to do this, I can send the formatted (in Wiki-template mode) file and let change the content of this page Alessio Bidoli Maxxdesignvc (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Ownership of content. Neither you nor the violinist have the right to decide the content of this English Wikipedia article. Constructive suggestions are welcomed but disruptive editing is not permitted. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I understand all your opinion. Now, I am practical for job choice, not so philosophically-oriented and I have no time to read the "biblical" long Wikipedia articles. Which are the steps to make correctly changes on a specific page? Who decides which content is true or well exposed? What are the so spoken COI? I am not interested in promotion of nothing or noone, I support just a technical help to have a biography changed. Is there a way in this multitreading consortium to reach this deal?Maxxdesignvc (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not willing to read and understand and follow the relevant English Wikipedia policies and guidelines, then you cannot have any input into the biography of this violinist. You have been blocked from that article because of your disruptive behavior, and now several administrators are paying close attention to the article. So, start by reading the guideline that I gave you a link to, and once you truly understand what it says, then we can have a conversation. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone wrote me I am not accepted here as person (!!!) Really do you think to know a person through a coded text he has put here? Maybe I am a man that don't like to undergone to rules and I operated here without to read all the suggestions before to touch a page. Well it was my fault, I agree, but personal injury is not permitted by my sight! I think Wikpedia is far to be a human oriented organisation and next time I will be asked to support with donation I will ingore such request. Money is always good (!) but persons are "unwelcome" when erroneously by-pass your "mormonic" ways to accept the news...Maxxdesignvc (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]