User talk:Meghan119
July 2024
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to North Nicosia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: North Nicosia was changed by Meghan119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86652 on 2024-07-11T06:03:14+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at North Nicosia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Meghan119! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Kebab several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Kebab, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Culture of California. CodeTalker (talk) 21:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Meghan119! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)