User talk:Meteoritekid
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Recent activity at Meteorite
[edit]You may wish to engage at Talk:Meteorite#Overly long contribution to the History. HopsonRoad (talk) 23:44, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Russian National Unity
[edit]You are correct, the article does not align with the sources listed in it, and it needs to be changed. BP OMowe (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Meteoritekid and BP OMowe, I've just become aware of this dispute. We've been having the very same problem at Far-right politics in Ukraine, Russian separatist forces in Donbas and Donetsk People's Republic. The same two or three editors have been working together to repeatedly revert changes, in what looks like a bid to hide and distort content on far-right Russian nationalists. I see one of the editors has also been involved at Russian National Unity, and some of the same misleading edits and same absurd arguments have been made. I see the same harassing messages have been posted on your talkpages too. Nearly all of these editors have a history of editing India-related articles, and all are fairly new accounts.
- The discussions are here, here and here. I also brought it to the dispute resolution noticeboard, but that failed due to lack of input. I think if more outside editors had seen what's been going on, this would've been dealt with by now. But it's still happening, so I'm thinking of taking it to the Administrator noticeboard and am making a list of diffs. ~Asarlaí 17:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Asarlaí and BP OMowe I appreciate your attention to this issue. I spent far too much time on this and ultimately gave up. After looking into it, I concluded that most of those accounts could be linked to at most 2-3 people -- often using a different account on a computer + mobile device. For example, users Extorc and ArvindPalaskar have both made extraordinarily detailed edits to pages regarding the technical specifications of Indian rockets, as well as other related pages (1) (2) (and see pages on the S139 Booster and Skyroot Aerospace), and user K6bee9's edit history is, in my opinion, clearly a sock of a very experienced Wikipedia user. I was pleasantly surprised to see that TolWol56 already seems to have been banned for this or other things, but I have no doubt that they are using multiple other accounts. I just don't have the time for this. Meteoritekid (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently been editing the Arab–Israeli conflict which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Selfstudier (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please be aware that this revert was your second in 24 hours, which, if you not the restrictions above on this topic, would place you in the hot seat, not the editor you are reverting, even if they are being more disruptive in spirit. You should self-revert, be patient and wait for other editors to weigh in on the edits/discussion. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- My first edit was not a revert. See the page history. Meteoritekid (talk) 07:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Violation
[edit]Hi. You violated 1RR with First edit and Second edit.
Please self revert. In not, I'll make a report at AE. Thanks. Dovidroth (talk) 06:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- I filed a report per your unjustified reverts and edits, that I believe qualify as an edit war. Meteoritekid (talk) 09:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)