User talk:Mhouston310

Jim Bowden[edit]

Please refrain from making this edit to the Jim Bowden page, as the changes are original research, do not use proper wiki formatting, and are removing references. Thank you.--Henry talk 17:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously stop, if you keep doing this, you will be blocked from editing.--Henry talk 23:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing if you continue to make this edit to the Jim Bowden page.--Henry talk 18:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Bowden (diver)[edit]

Hi there - I think your edits to Jim Bowden (diver) accidentally refer to another Jim Bowden. Accordingly, I have reverted the edits to the article about the diver. If you think this is a mistake, pls let me know. --Legis (talk - contribs) 22:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STOP FOR GOD(DESS) SAKE!!!!! You're not even talking about the same person as the subject of the article. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jim Bowden. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]