User talk:Mia8

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Andrew O'Connor (writer). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 22:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew O'Connor (writer), without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew O'Connor (writer), you will be blocked from editing. Do not remove the cleanup templates placed at the start of the article. Instead read them and try to improve the article. Triwbe (talk) 09:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mia8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Flagging Andrew O'Connor (writer) for further review

Hello, Mia8 … I recently encountered the article about Andrew O'Connor (writer) and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that other editors may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now. — Triwbe (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew O'Connor (writer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andrew O'Connor (writer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — 72.75.108.10 (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]