Jump to content

User talk:Michaeljbroderick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2007

[edit]

Re: Concerning your creation of the article "Michael J. Broderick"

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Michael J. Broderick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

violates WP:COI

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on me! | Email Me! 07:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re (2): Concerning your creation of the article "Michael J. Broderick"

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Michael J. Broderick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

violates WP:COI

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on me! | Email Me! 07:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Please read our guideline on autobiographies and conflict of interest for information on editing about yourself. Riana 08:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Michael J. Broderick

[edit]

I've nominated Michael J. Broderick, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Michael J. Broderick satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Broderick and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Michael J. Broderick during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk 13:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


June 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from Michael J. Broderick, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk 13:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

[edit]

Hi, for the Michael J. Broderick article even though I wrote it there is nothing that is subjective and not citable or quoted in publications. The article is a work in progress and is based on facts. I see in the guidelines that it states: "Writing autobiographies is highly discouraged. It is not impossible to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography, and they are not strictly forbidden." I am new at this, and am having trouble attaching the citations to enhance my ethos and validity to be here. Here is another published source from a Chilean newspaper: http://www.diarioeldia.cl/detalle.asp?id=24440&idsec=7 Wikipedia has limited entries on important members of my industry. I request the tags be removed until the article is complete and then action can be taken. Thank you.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RJASE1"

Michaeljbroderick 13:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

Dear Mr. Broderick. It it one of the general policies of Wikipedia that editors do NOT edit article about themselves and about any organization that they are close affiliated with. This is to avoid Conflict of Interest even if the information is backed by creditable sources and concret facts. You are welcomed to make constructive edits other articles on Wikipedia. Have fun editing and have a nice day. Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on me! | Email Me! 14:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, Mr. Broderick, please refrain from edit the article Michael J. Broderick as it is and will be considered a Conflict of Interest, even if the article is not complete, as it will be a violation of Wikipedia policy. Any further edits may or may not result in serious consequences. Removing tags, without a full discussion, are considered edit-warring. Please follow Wikipedia guildlines. Thank you. Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on me! | Email Me! 14:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reposting of your deleted article

[edit]

Be advised that your re-creation of the Michael J. Broderick, created through your sockpuppet account, is being speedy-deleted. Your efforts to subvert the Article for deletion process has been found out, including your efforts to change the content of the AfD discussion. Your accounts will reported as violating numerous Wikipedia policies, likely resulting in your being blocked. Realkyhick 04:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]