User talk:Michaels541

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Sulake. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 14:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sulake

Don't edit war. Provide sources, instead, for the material you wish to include. Unsourced material may be removed at any time. Please read WP:RS in order to determine what kinds of sources are acceptable. You should also read WP:COI and WP:SPA. Thank you. Qworty (talk) 18:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sulake on Conflict of Interest Noticeboard

Hello again. You have a WP:COI. Thus, please stop editing the article, and make your arguments here [1] instead. Thank you. Qworty (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Sulake

Your recent editing history at Sulake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GSK ● talk ● evidence 19:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sulake

Do NOT WP:EDITWAR. Do NOT add material that is unsourced. Please read WP:RS thoroughly. Also, please discuss all changes on the article's talk page instead of editing the article. Thank you. Qworty (talk) 19:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Habbo, you may be blocked from editing. I'd say AOL is a pretty reliable source. Stop edit warring. GSK ● talk ● evidence 19:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at WP:COIN#Sulake, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GSK ● talk ● evidence 19:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for disruptive editing of various sorts, including, but not restricted to, using Wikipedia for promotion, edit warring, removing other editors' talk page comments, and removing a report critical of yourself at a noticeboard. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, Michaels541. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sulake, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 23:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New modified Habbo logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New modified Habbo logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A screenshot of a Habbo public profile, August 2015.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A screenshot of a Habbo public profile, August 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 21:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]