User talk:Michel Boulegue

October 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. If you feel you have been judged to harshly, please contact my user – TheSecretImpostor (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use our articles to advance a Wolof POV and make disingenous edits or you will be reported and blocked.

You have been advancing a Wolof POV on various articles including the removal of content and replacing it with "Wolof" when the previously cited source did not mention the Wolof, neither do they support your POV. Examples: Senegalese wrestling (like this disingenous POV [1]), saltigue, etc (too many to name). This is not a forum. Neither is it a place for you to advance your Wolof POV and disingenous edit. If this persist, you will be reported and blocked.92.207.210.180 (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible WP:SOCK of User:Robert Boulegue

I see that you have now been blocked. I also have concerns that you are a possible sock/meat of User:Robert Boulegue or vice-versa. I was going to file a case against both of you for a possible Sock puppet investigation but I see you have both been blocked for that too.92.207.210.180 (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]