User talk:MikeMaynardUK

Welcome

Hello, MikeMaynardUK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you have edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS FOR THE COMMENT Hi! I'm really sorry, I didn't understand Wikipedia and so I have only just seen your comment. I've only just seen your message because I logged in after our page was updated. Is this new Napier Partnership Limited page OK? (It wasn't updated by us!). What else could we do to improve the quality of our own page?

Thanks! Mike

PRCA

Thanks for the message. There is absolutely no reason why you should not create a new page for this organisation as long as it meets the wikipedia guidelines. Good luck! Deb (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I'll try to do that in the next few days! Mike.

Nomination of Jennic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennic (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 15:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Napier Partnership Limited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Napier Partnership Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napier Partnership Limited (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kinara (company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kinara (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. If Deep Vision is Kinara, then this company is notable. However, there isn't any sourcing which shows that they are the same company. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your helpful comments. This is really helpful, but I have a question. I've not found a source that specifically talks about Kinara previously being called Deep Vision. There are sources that mention it, for example: https://www.eenewsanalog.com/en/chip-industry-veteran-segers-joins-edge-ai-firm-kinara/. Would this be acceptable to show that they are the same company, please?

Thanks so much for bearing with me on this!

Mike MikeMaynardUK (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kinara (company) has been accepted

Kinara (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]