User talk:Mithila Mimuna

Welcome!

Hello, Mithila Mimuna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rithvik Dhanjani has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

If this similarly named account is yours, please ensure that you do not use both accounts concurrently to edit the same topics per WP:SOCK. Thank you,--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content

Your recent edits to Rithvik Dhanjani have been reverted as they added a large amount of unsourced personal info, unencyclopedic content and wording, overly promotional material and copyright violations to the article. If you are receiving any undisclosed monetary compensation for your edits, which I very much believe you are, you are in violation of the Wikimedia Foundations Terms of Use. I also doubt that this is your first and only account as you are making the same edits, in the same fashion, as myriad blocked accounts before you.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rithvik Dhanjani. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring to restore unsourced personal info and promotional material to biography articles despite multiple warnings and explanations that such edits are contrary to Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your first edits after your block expired were to restore unsourced and poorly sourced personal information, unencyclopedic content (e.g. skin colouring and favourite food) and copyright violations you uploaded to Commons to Rithvik Dhanjani. As such I have reblocked your account for two weeks. I strongly suggest that you use the time to review the policies that have been explained to you previously; if the disruption continues after the block expires I imagine the next block will be more permanent. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you are obviously evading your block via this account I have reset your block. While blocked you cannot edit under any account or IP. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]