User talk:MixnetARN

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article 97.3 FM (Brisbane) and other Australian Radio Network articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. SEO⁷⁵ ^[talk] 23:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 97.3 FM (Brisbane). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SEO⁷⁵ ^[talk] 23:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mix 106.3, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your username is being discussed

Hello, MixnetARN, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Wikipedia has a policy on what usernames editors can use. Unfortunately, concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with that policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it here. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. Is he back? (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The username discussion has now been temporarily closed since you have not been editing since the concern was raised, and there is no clear consensus that your name is a blatant violation of the username policy. The discussion may be reopened if you resume editing, especially if your edits are considered promotional. Is he back? (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]