User talk:Moconner

IF I WAS CONNER12 I WOULD BE USING IT NOW TO EDIT.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moconner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not oconner12 and I am bringing neutrality to wikepedia article

Decline reason:

You just happen to have virtually the same username and make virtually the same edits to the same articles. Right. — Smashville^talk 17:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not oconner12 but I noticed he is also involved like many other people to bring neutrality to some of the articles. Please unblock me and block dchall and the gang for using wikipedia for their agenda driven articles.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moconner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand the reason for my block. I am an American Businessman familiar with the region. I am trying to improve the quality of info on Wikepedia. Dchall and the gang have been writing biased info on the Wikipedia and are not familiar with either the history or the region. Many people have tried to correct them as you can see. I also tried to correct him and his gang and they accused me of being someone else. Wikipedia needs to bring neutrality to their articles and remove agenda driven info

Decline reason:

You involved in an edit war in several articles; please limit yourself to one account when participating in such a heated discussion. Clearly, are also using Oconner12 (talk · contribs) and it is currently unblocked. Please use that account only. Kuru ^talk 16:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BLOCKED

I contributed to wikipidia but unfortunately I have been blocked. It seems some people want to write agenda driven opinions and do not tolerate another point of view wikipedia

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to War in North-West Pakistan, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 17:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]