Jump to content

User talk:MonarchyIsNotTheBest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:MonarchySucksWang)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MonarchyIsNotTheBest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My name is not intended to cause trouble, or to be "unencyclopedic," it instead intends to portray an opinion to which I am very much entitled. Wang is also a reference to the creator of the magnetic core drive in computer technology.

Decline reason:

You are entitled to your opinion elsewhere. If you are not willing to change your obviously inappropriate name, then there is no reason to unblock. Kuru (talk) 15:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MonarchyIsNotTheBest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First reason, which Kuru declined: My name is not intended to cause trouble, or to be "unencyclopedic," it instead intends to portray an opinion to which I am very much entitled. Wang is also a reference to the creator of the magnetic core drive in computer technology.

Second Reason: If I am entitled to my opinion elsewhere, which by extension means my opinion is not wanted here, users who have names referring to Jesus being our savior, or users which in their names refer to a particular thing or being as "awesome" should also be removed as their opinions could be better served elsewhere.

Come on, get real. I've seen the Catholic church give better reasons not to use birth control than you guys give for me not being entitled to write what I want on this 'free to edit' and highly inaccurate website.

Decline reason:

We're real. The name is disruptive. The proof is the disingenuity of the "magnetic core drive" comment. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MonarchyIsNotTheBest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First reason, which Kuru declined: My name is not intended to cause trouble, or to be "unencyclopedic," it instead intends to portray an opinion to which I am very much entitled. Wang is also a reference to the creator of the magnetic core drive in computer technology.

Second Reason which jpgordon declined: If I am entitled to my opinion elsewhere, which by extension means my opinion is not wanted here, users who have names referring to Jesus being our savior, or users which in their names refer to a particular thing or being as "awesome" should also be removed as their opinions could be better served elsewhere.

Come on, get real. I've seen the Catholic church give better reasons not to use birth control than you guys give for me not being entitled to write what I want on this 'free to edit' and highly inaccurate website.

Third Reason: disingenuity is not a word. Please speak the Queen's English if you are going to be so vehement and adamant about holding up the cause of the Monarchy and it not sucking Wang.

Also this might help you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory

Decline reason:

Your username is entirely inappropriate and violates Wikipedia policy, as set out here. There is no ambiguity here - your username is inappropriate. End of story. You are welcome to ask for a username change, as noted on the linked policy page. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MonarchyIsNotTheBest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Do I break the policy by being disruptive or offensive? Either way, I find names referring to Jesus as offensive and demand you block all such users immediately as per Wikipedia policy.

On a lighter note, could you change my username to MonarchyIsNotTheGreatest, or is that still too disruptive or offensive?

Accept reason:

I am unblocking you to allow you to request a change of username to MonarchyIsNotTheGreatest at Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple. Please apply as soon as you can, and certainly within 24 hours, or you may be reblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You should be aware that, following the string of disruptive and unconstructive unblock requests you made, there is a good chance that editors will be suspicious of you, and keep an eye on your editing, so I advise you to be very careful not to give any grounds for another block. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]