User talk:Morriswa/Cup submissions

Challenge request

I would like to challenge the claiming of South Carolina Highway 3 Business for a point, as it is not its own article. --Rs chen 7754 01:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects don't get any points? Also, did I put the proper number of points for the main article? South Carolina is below the USRD average for WikiWork. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge accepted. If we gave points for redirects, everyone would be creating redirects and not working on the articles. Yes, you had the right number of points. –Fredddie ™ 02:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia State Route 313

What needs to be corrected on the article? Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for more effort than a three-sentence route description. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect more than three sentences for 22 miles. –Fredddie ™ 02:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge request

Veterans Parkway (Savannah, Georgia) is a county route, and should only get 2.5 points. I also am concerned about the route description: it could be folded into the lead easily, and thus would be a stub. The road parallels a military base that isn't even mentioned in the article. --Rs chen 7754 03:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge accepted. I agree with the Rschen's assessment that this is basically a county road stub and Georgia has enough articles that need improving. Normally, as a county road, it would get half points, but since it's really a stub, too, I'm giving it zero points. –Fredddie ™ 04:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge request

Fort Washington Way should only get 2 points, not 5 points. Also, it could be easily merged into Interstate 71.Dough 48 72 04:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to challenge this as the article doesn't need to exist. I have reduced it from an article to a set index. Imzadi 1979 → 05:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge accepted. No points. –Fredddie ™ 22:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible challenge/request for inspection

A few of the recent stub-to-C submissions show the replacement of GDOT sources with Google Maps. Is there a reason why the GDOT sources are not usable? —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 03:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem with it. He's been replacing a report that is now 11 years old and is no longer available on GDOT's website. If the GeoTRAQS website worked as it's supposed to, this would be a different answer. –Fredddie ™ 00:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]