User talk:Mouris Bashir

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mouris. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mouris~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ajay trehan.jpg.jpg

I noticed that you just removed the copyright tag from this article so I undid that edit because all files uploaded to Wikipedia require this information. If your intention was to get the file deleted, please feel free to add {{Db-g7}} to the file page. Thanks, Feinoha ^Talk 11:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, Mouris Bashir. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:21, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page Ajay Trehan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the content of the page appeared to be purely promotion of something or someone, and was unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

I don't know whether you have yet read my message on my talk page concerning copyright in connection with the deleted article AuthBridge Research Services, but if you haven't then please do. After writing that message, it occurred to me to check the text of the other article you created, Ajay Trehan, and I found that too consisted largely (or maybe even entirely) of text copied from AuthBridge's web site. Unfortunately, that means that we cannot accept it on Wikipedia, so I shall have to delete it again. Many problems with writing articles can be cured by rewriting, but keeping text which infringes copyright in the publicly visible history of an article is illegal, even if it is removed from the latest revision. The best advice I can offer you is to follow the suggestion that I made earlier, to stick to just making minor improvements to existing articles for now, and not to try creating new articles until you have more experience of what is acceptable and what isn't. That may seem like trying to discourage you from contributing articles to Wikipedia, but in fact it is the opposite: you will stand a far better chance of eventually creating articles that stay on Wikipedia if you do it the way I suggest. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, another reason for not copying content from a company's web page, apart from copyright, is that a company's web site virtually always presents information relating to the company in a promotional way, which makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia. That is no doubt why the articles you created read like advertising, which is what led to their being deleted in the first place. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for promotion, and for violation of the Wikimedia Foundations terms of use. After being informed of the requirement to disclose any paid involvement in matters where you were editing, you not only failed to do so, but actually denied any connection to a company for whom you are in fact working. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ajay Trehan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajay Trehan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Trehan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 00:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]