User talk:Mr.Cappadocia

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Misandry. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Misandry. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Feminism [1], you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cailil ^talk 15:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your perception of reality as described in the above-referenced screed seems to be only marginally tangent with the real world. In particular, your re-interpretation of "misandry" is "fringe" in the extreme; and your attacks on a respected editor are unsupported by the facts. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Antifeminism [2], you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cailil ^talk 11:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, including POV-pushing, refactoring, and generally not here to create an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]