User talk:Mracew
Hi. Welcome to my talk page. Please leave messages for me here, and I will respond here.
Nice work!
[edit]Nice work catching and reverting vandalism! A reminder, though: avoid using the word "vandalism" in edit summaries, especially if it is only "possible vandalism"# If it isn't really vandalism, we don't want to scare a good faith but mistaken editor away# Thanks! ##User:Liquidluck|liquidluck##✽##User talk:Liquidluck|talk## 04:42, 21 April 2010 #UTC#
Greater Los Angeles area
[edit]This guy ##Special:Contributions/Moalli|Moalli## is putting everything into the Greater L#A# Area, even the ##Channel Islands### Yours, ##User:GeorgeLouis|GeorgeLouis## ###User talk:GeorgeLouis|talk### 21:16, 17 September 2010 #UTC#
- Yeah, I saw that# I guess, if you think about it, every thing everywhere is in the "greater Los Angeles" area# I saw that he has a thing for the greater Sacramento area, too# ##User:Mracew|Mracew## ###User talk:Mracew#top|talk### 21:38, 23 September 2010 #UTC#
- Thanks for the backup# Appreciate it# Was tired of trying to reason with him# Regards, --##User:Manway|Manway## ###User talk:Manway|talk### 05:05, 31 December 2010 #UTC#
- No problem# Imagine what this guy could accomplish if he put his mind to something productive#####User:Mracew|Mracew## ###User talk:Mracew#top|talk### 05:10, 31 December 2010 #UTC#
- Re: Moalli - The best way is to document warnings one by one# Use Twinkle to help automate it# Report the dude to ##WP:ARV### That ought to stop him# I'll help now that I know he's doing it again# Regards, --##User:Manway|Manway## ###User talk:Manway|talk### 20:34, 31 December 2010 #UTC#
- Done reverting# And reported# Thanks for the heads up# --##User:Manway|Manway## ###User talk:Manway|talk### 20:45, 31 December 2010 #UTC#
- Re: Moalli - The best way is to document warnings one by one# Use Twinkle to help automate it# Report the dude to ##WP:ARV### That ought to stop him# I'll help now that I know he's doing it again# Regards, --##User:Manway|Manway## ###User talk:Manway|talk### 20:34, 31 December 2010 #UTC#
- No problem# Imagine what this guy could accomplish if he put his mind to something productive#####User:Mracew|Mracew## ###User talk:Mracew#top|talk### 05:10, 31 December 2010 #UTC#
Possibly unfree File:A#B# Miller#jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, ##:File:A#B# Miller#jpg##, has been listed at ##Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files## because its copyright status is unclear or disputed# If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted# You may find more information on the ##:File:A#B# Miller#jpg|file description page### You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ##Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 24#File:A#B# Miller#jpg|the discussion## if you are interested in it not being deleted# Thank you# --##User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre## ###User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk### 17:28, 24 October 2010 #UTC#
Disambiguation link notification for June 22
[edit]Hi# Thank you for your recent edits# Wikipedia appreciates your help# We noticed though that when you edited ##Fontana, California##, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ##Chris Stewart## ###tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks#py/Fontana%2C_California|check to confirm## | ##tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver#py/Fontana%2C_California|fix with Dab solver#### Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean###" article titles# Read the ##User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ## • Join us at the ##Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject###
It's OK to remove this message# Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ##User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions### Thanks, ##User:DPL bot|DPL bot## ###User talk:DPL bot|talk### 11:00, 22 June 2013 #UTC#
settlement date for ##Fontana, California##
[edit]Thank you for citing your sources. The Anicic book says that Miller named Fontana in 1913. It does not claim that Fontana was settled that year. The school district website credits Miller as the founder of Fontana, but gives a 1905 date. Therefore, the claim in the infobox is not supported by either source. Is it original research? Given that California has been inhabited for thousands of years, it seems unlikely that nobody lived in the area prior to 1913. —Stepheng3 #talk# 15:08, 6 October 2014 #UTC#
- Are you being purposefully obtuse? Original research? I'm not that old, friend. I think the school district is referencing when Miller arrived in the area, not when the area became Fontana. Anicic's book is the superior source, so I will change the wording to "founded" in the infobox.Mracew (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- No, I'm not trying to be any more dim-witted than I am, not am I implying anything about your age. "Founded" does seem a more accurate term for what Miller did, but perhaps "Named" would be even better. The book says he "gave Fontana its name", which to me seems like a different thing. Cities may be renamed long after they were founded. —Stepheng3 (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Are you being purposefully obtuse? Original research? I'm not that old, friend. I think the school district is referencing when Miller arrived in the area, not when the area became Fontana. Anicic's book is the superior source, so I will change the wording to "founded" in the infobox.Mracew (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Fontana's treasurer
[edit]My error. Thank you for correcting it. Best regards,—Stepheng3 (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 13 April
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the A. B. Miller High School page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Mracew. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mracew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)