User talk:MutualAvl

Welcome!

Hello, MutualAvl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to make a half dozen reverts, please explain. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that's a good point. Will make sure to do so going forward. MutualAvl (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autarky

Hello,

I'm Jakksen, this is my account I made a year solely for this singular topic.

I noticed you undid all of my edits - I'll not allow the page to remain the way it is crafted to be now, as it isn't accurate at all to the history of the topic.

This page MUST discuss the Nazis, Fascism, Imperial Japan, Fascist/Anarchist Spain - ALL of this is just part of the history of this particular ideology.

I kno that is fairly damning considering I've just listed epitomes of evil - that just the facts of the matter tho.

You can help me correct the page and still have influence or not. I'll eventually get my way regardless, as I am standing on historical facts and the autarky defined on the wiki rn is simply nonsense.

Have a fantastic day.

- Jakksen Notarky (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notarky, you are not going to just have your way. You may discuss your proposed changed on the talk page. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I intend to have the page written by actual economists and historians whose credentials cannot be called to question.

This page is not factual - someone has already had their way, what is true is not mine or yours - it isn't dependent on us at all.

That is what I want this page to be. Its a literal example of a lie as it is - that you said what you did simply proves to me that you do not know what I do, because if you did, you could not arrive at the conclusion "I'm trying to have my way" - you would simply see what I mean.

If you care to educate yourself - or just compare a REAL article about autarky to this nonsense, I have a link for you:

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/autarky.asp

That article was revised in the last 2 weeks by credentialled individuals. If you compare the two, you'll notice some "inconsistency" to say the very least.

I challenge you to invoke all your skills of logic and reason and tell me which of the 2 sources contains content that could be cited by a PHD Doctoral Thesis? Who could possibly defend to experts anything written about the autarky found on Wikipedia rn in 2024??

I do intend to fix this page tho. Had I done so last year almost 40,000 people wouldn't have seen this deliberate and sustained "misinterpretation" of this ideology.

The word "lie" fits all this much better.

I hope have a great day - I mean no disrespect.

- Jakksen Notarky Notarky (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]