User talk:NCFCQ

Cody McDonald

Anyway, I'll take this to AfD (and it will be deleted) if he doesn't make his debut in the next game or two. He's not yet notable. --Dweller (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. No worries. He's not been registered in time for tonight's game, but I'll wait and see his level of involvement in City's next squad before deciding if an AfD is a waste of the community's time or appropriate. --Dweller (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Daley

Nice one. NB I have pages in my userspace for all the remaining youth players with squad numbers (and a few others) awaiting 1st team debuts. If any do make their debut, please feel free to update the page and move it to mainspace. --Dweller (talk) 09:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I forgot to mention Korey Smith --Dweller (talk) 12:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Mooney

Is there any chance you could change David Mooney back to Dave, as it is just the fact that the English media don't know him very well that he is referred to as David. He appeared on Monday Night Soccer last Monday, where his name appeared as dave and he was referred to as Dave as well by the presenter.

It's a bit like Ger Cunningham. His full name is Gerry, but people call him Ger.--86.41.74.144 (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it back for now, please feel free to add your thoughts to the discussion I started on the talk page.--NCFCQ (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another one cued up, ready for debut

User:Dweller/Danny Kelly (footballer). If/when he makes his pro debut, just add the debut details and move it into mainspace. --Dweller (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL

Under the terms of the GFDL, you can't just cut and paste Tom Adeyemi's article from my userspace into mainspace and then upgrade it. My work needs to be attributed. You could have done this in an edit summary (noting it had been c+pd from User:Dweller/Tom Adeyemi) but even that's not really good enough, because the userpage will inevitably be deleted now that it's in mainspace. What you should have done was move the article, using the "move" button. This isn't me being precious or fussy, the same applies to any user's work. I'm going to have to fix this, which is a pain, because you've not just replicated my edits but added to them, meaning I can't just overwrite the page as I'll either lose your improvements or add them under my own name, which is the same problem.

Please see Wikipedia:How_to_fix_cut-and-paste_moves. --Dweller (talk) 10:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's no worries, nice reply. It actually took me less time to do than I thought it would. What a terrible, terrible start to the season. I think it was a bit freaky though and I'm not overly doom-filled. Some confidence will have to be rebuilt quickly! Quiz question - when was the last time a team got stuffed by a six goal margin on opening day and wasn't bottom of the table!?!?!? --Dweller (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

I'm blushing --Dweller (talk) 07:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carrow Road

Please chime in at Talk:Carrow Road. Thanks --Dweller (talk) 13:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Gunn

Would you like to join the efforts to push this to FA status? --Dweller (talk) 12:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 Norwich City F.C. season

Hey. I note you re-added the spacing in the score lines which is a shame. I use WP:DASH to help here which says to use unspaced en-dashes in this case. Obviously a lot of the community are unaware of the WP:MOS or how to correctly use en-dashes, but in deference to your continual re-addition of the spaces, I will leave this article to be non-MOS-compliant. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:35, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the extremely delayed reply. Thanks, at least I now know what you meant by "fixed". I will freely admit I was only changing the format back to what I have been most used to in my dealings with football season articles here. I'm fairly intrigued as to why the MOS is apparently so repeatedly breached in these cases. Perhaps everyone is doing as I did here and following the herd. Or, is it not possible that, with a list of footballbox templates as in a season article, then these en dashes could come under point 4 of WP:NDASH? Clearly the spaces would not be at all appropriate if these scores were written as part of a sentence in normal text, but in this kind of listing of scores, the spaces seem to make sense (to me, anyway) as means of an extra visual separator. This is just me speculating. --NCFCQ (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you ever see this...

Please do enable your email. I'd have loved your input at Talk:Carrow_Road#Schematic_plan, for example. Hope you're well. --Dweller (talk) 11:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good thanks (it's been a while) and have now activated email. You and Rambling Man got exactly what I meant re the Carrow Road schematic. --NCFCQ (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I've only just seen this. Glad we got it right! --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 07:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NCFCQ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]