User talk:Natker

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bacteriovorax stolpii has been accepted

Bacteriovorax stolpii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bacteriovorax stolpii

Thanks for creating the Bacteriovorax stolpii article. I noticed that you did not add many wikilinks to other articles. Links like that are useful for readers, since they allow them to learn more about topics they may not be familiar with. It would be helpful if you could add links to terms like these. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great work!

Hi, I'm Eryk from the Wiki Education Foundation. I happened to notice the really great work you did on the Bacteriovorax stolpii article! I wondered if you'd be interested in sharing some of your experiences working on this site for our blog? We could use your real name or your Wikipedia username. We find students like to participate since it gives them a pretty positive search result related to the field they're studying in. If you have a minute, you can drop me an e-mail at eryk@wikiedu.org, mention your username and what course you were in, and answer any of the following questions, and I'd be excited to get some attention directed toward your good work. 1. What are your goals (career or academics wise?) 2. Did you have any experience with Wikipedia before the class started? What did you think of Wikipedia before you started work on this assignment? 3. How did you find the process of writing a Wikipedia article, compared to if you had written a traditional paper on the topic? 4. Do you think you learned more about your subject as a result of writing for Wikipedia?

Thanks for your time! Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finding an article

To find a good article to edit, check WikiProject Mass spectrometry, especially sections on articles by quality and importance: Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometry#Assessment; and articles by popularity: Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometry#Popular pages. There is also a tool that you can use to sort articles, for example Stub[1]and Start[2] class. Remember the goal is to move an article up two quality units: nothing to Start, Stub to C, or Start to B. --Kkmurray (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Choice

Articles might choose for MS class

Thermospray
Anode ray
Liquid metal ion source
Thermal ionization
Laser spray ionization

Natker (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final Choice

Mass-analyzed ion-kinetic-energy spectrometry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natker (talk • contribs)

Mass-analyzed ion-kinetic-energy spectrometry will need to go to C Class. --Kkmurray (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Hello Natker, I am Justin Grennell from the mass spectrometry class, and I will be reviewing you future work in the class. I wish you the best with finding a topic and let me know if you need any assistance. Jgrennel (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Revivew

Hey Natker, would you mind reviewing the plasma-afterglow entry again. I would appreciate any constructive criticism. NicoliTesta (talk) 22:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article problems

Your additions to the Mass-analyzed ion-kinetic-energy spectrometry article include passages copied verbatim or nearly verbatim from a non-free source. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, your entire contribution has to be deleted. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]