User talk:NaturalMedicineCommunity

Welcome!

Hi NaturalMedicineCommunity! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Astragalus propinquus

Hi there! My name's Tamzin. I'm afraid I had to revert your recent contributions to Astragalus propinquus. Wikipedia relies on citations to reliable sources. It's not enough to just say that people can find sources if they look for them. To add a claim to an article, especially a potentially controversial claim, you need to provide explicit sources. And when it comes to medical claims, we hold sources to a particularly high standard. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out on my talk page, or by replying here with the template {{ping|Tamzin}}. You can also talk to other experienced users at the Teahouse. Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

There was an automatic citation. Named 8, led to a meta analysis of a Dr Guo. Is my edit still active or has it been disabled? NaturalMedicineCommunity (talk) 09:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

That citation, which was there before your edit, is still there. I removed the sentence Although countless studies can be found on almost every medical database on the planet. If you think the article should go into more detail about Guo et al.'s findings, then you can neutrally describe what they found. Directing our readers to unnamed "countless studies" doesn't really help them. Describing in detail what studies Guo et al. looked at and what they concluded about those studies, that could benefit our readers. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 00:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)