User talk:Neilbarman

Welcome!

Hello, Neilbarman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Pubmed[edit]

Note that when adding pubmed numbers, there's no advantage to adding a url that connects to the pubmed page for the article. In cite journal templates, the url field is for full-texts, or abstracts in case there is no pubmed or doi attached. Thanks, WLU (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On stroke you reinserted references that I previously thought were unnecessary. Could you clarify why all studies with the Merci retriever need to be cited. Please make it clear to us whether you are at all associated with the manufacturer (see WP:COI).

I also agree with WLU's above post about using URLs to PubMed in the "url" field where the "pmid" field is sufficient. JFW | T@lk 21:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Merci L5.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Merci L5.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: please also provide details on which software was used to create the image, and as requested above, what your affiliation with the manufacturer is.

You might be interested in seeing this as it's being deleted.[edit]

Ardian (company). See also User_talk:Sulmues#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Ardian_.28company.29 --sulmues talk contributions 15:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ardian (company)[edit]

The article Ardian (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, references do not establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 11:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Merci L5 small.jpg[edit]

The file File:Merci L5 small.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]