User talk:NekSeOvajVijekGordi

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NekSeOvajVijekGordi. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NekSeOvajVijekGordi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because of an account that made three comments on the talk page? Seriously? I do have an old account but that account is not active and is not used in any kind of discussions, especially since i am only interested in Highlander tribe history, especially Kuči tribe, i see no reason why i would use a sock puppet to discuss stuff with others, as i did over the last few months. Pretty normal discussions, don't see a reason for a ban. The block is most definitely not necessary, as the other account is 1. not mine, 2. not active, and 3. the whole situation happened 2/3 weeks ago

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms you are NaBesmrtnomVisu (talk · contribs). The evidence laid out in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NekSeOvajVijekGordi is clear. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NekSeOvajVijekGordi (talk) 22:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Burstw0w

User:Burstw0w, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Burstw0w and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Burstw0w during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 07:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that's my old account and i dont mind it being deleted. I am not denying that burstw0w is my account. That account is not what got me banned and i dont care about it. NekSeOvajVijekGordi (talk) 08:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]