User talk:Netforcarbon

Hello Netforcarbon. We are in the same WikiEdu course and I'm trying to learn how to use user Talk pages. Prof Whitney (talk) 14:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Excellent way to really learn how to use the talk feature thank you. Netforcarbon (talk) 06:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Welcome Netforcarbon!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,181,081 registered editors!

Hello, Netforcarbon. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Jeffrey (Wiki Ed), one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful: Introduction to Wikipedia (and editing) The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies: 1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly 2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources 3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, Jeffrey (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

Jeffrey (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Jeffrey! You are making this wiki-learning process fun and empowering! Best day to you. Misty Netforcarbon (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Climate finance in the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Climate finance in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate finance in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flounder fillet (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm Flounder fillet. An article that you recently made, Climate finance in the United States, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flounder fillet (talk) 20:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Use of AI; sourcing problems

Continuing from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate finance in the United States: when you say you used an AI review and format assistant and the content is from my notes, do you mean you wrote an outline and the AI assistant turned the outline into a Wikipedia article? Or are you saying that you wrote all the words yourself? Did the AI also find the sources in the article, or did you insert them yourself?

Disregarding how the article topic is very similar to Climate change policy of the United States, the use of AI to create an article from an outline is still a problem, even if the AI didn't write the article from scratch, since LLMs often have difficulties writing from a neutral point of view and satisfying our verifiability policy.

This article contains plenty of non-neutral material such as ...underscoring the role of private capital in climate finance. It also contains very vague material, such as Bipartisan support has emerged for climate-related financial policies, particularly regarding infrastructure resilience and adaptation to climate impacts. The entire section on Climate Week NYC is likely WP:UNDUE. Overall, the article is written like an essay.

In addition, articles should be mainly based on reliable, independent, secondary sources. Almost all of the sources in the article are primary, and some don't even support the claims being made. For example, the sentence ...financial institutions such as BlackRock have pledged to increase investments in green technologies... cites a source that doesn't even mention BlackRock. Even if it was sourced correctly, this sentence would likely be WP:UNDUE.

I hope this feedback will help you make useful edits on Wikipedia. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)