Jump to content

User talk:Nezzdude

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Nezzdude, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Prince (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Southern United States. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eastcote (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting other people's edits, as you are doing in Southern United States. You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. If you revert again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Please discuss any disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you. Hoppingalong (talk) 22:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Southern United States, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eastcote (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 18:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Southern United States has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Southern United States, you may be blocked from editing. Eastcote (talk) 13:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to American Civil War, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 03:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing sourced content from the American Civil War article. If you think there is a problem with the sources - they are not reliable, they do not support what the article says, or they are contradicted by other reliable sources - please explain further on the article's talk page.VoluntarySlave (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]