User talk:Nihonjoe/Samurai

Checked and unchecked

Joe -- is there a way we can separate the first list into Articles we've checked and articles we haven't checked? There are red links interspersed in the blue, presumably because you've checked the blue ones inbetween. Kuuzo -- do you, by any chance, own a copy of The Samurai Sourcebook? Mango juice^talk 13:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anything below the large block of redlinks has not been checked. All the redlinks )and any blue links within them) have been checked. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 23:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and any redlinks in the part below the large block of redlinks are mostly duplicates of already deleted articles above that. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 23:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mango, the reason there are blue inbetween the red is NOT that they have already been checked. See, the list at the bottom that I brought to the top had duplicates of ones above. So, the red ones you see are actually ones you guys have ALREADY deleted. So, around 378 is where the deletions have stopped. The red ones below are duplicates I didn't know about and I brought them up. Sorry if I confused you. To explain this better: see the list at the top of this discussion page? That list was at the top of the "article page" AND at the very bottom. This happened with a few othes not on the list that had been previously deleted. Therefore, they were deleted before the list was compiled on NihonJoe's page. Also, then, when you delete ones from 1-378, the ones down below started being deleted as well, as duplicates. Therefore, 378 on are fairly unchecked, unless you count the clan pages. So, it's dangerous to assume any blue ones have been checked that are AFTER 378. Lastly, I used the "find" feature on my browser and the red ones after 378 are exact duplicates of ones before. Sorry, again, if I did it all wrong. AND sorry for saying 378 so many times :)

I own the Samurai Sourcebook. What do you need? Nagaeyari 21:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few contributions that Darin marked as "from" the Samurai Sourcebook, and have been made recently. Could you check if, for instance, Udenuki is a copyvio from there? Mango juice^talk 20:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check Udenuki's talk page Nagaeyari 20:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any blue link has not been checked unless there is a description after it as to why it won't be deleted. --Kuuzo 23:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seach Engine Spidering

Is there some sort of code we can put into this page to keep it from getting spidered from google etc.? It doesn't really serve a purpose for getting googled, and really shouldn't appear in search engines. --Kuuzo 04:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. I don't know that it's really needed anymore, so I can delete it. Any further articles can just be tagged for speedy deletion. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 07:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is still one last section I have to go through, but once that's done, it should be finished, might as well keep it until then. Thanks --Kuuzo 23:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please mark any further articles for speedy deletion. I will be deleting this page until tomorrow. Copyvio articles can easily be deleted without needing to be listed here. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 00:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost done going through these articles, and there are about 9 on here that need to be deleted - if you don't mind, this is far easier to keep track of all this - do you mind if we keep this up until I'm finished? I should be done within a week. --Kuuzo 07:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably a good idea. This whole thing started when I denied a copyvio-based speedy request because it wasn't a "blatant copyright violation", so more speedy requests might well run into the same problem. Mango juice^talk 12:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]