User talk:Nlph220708

National library for public health

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of National library for public health, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.cehi-hils.org.uk/2008/04/the_national_library_for_publi.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of National library for public health

A tag has been placed on National library for public health requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from National library for public health, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article National library for public health, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.

--Orange Mike | Talk 18:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nlph220708 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not an intend to spam, my intentions are honest and, yes I am related to the project but this is not a company so I'm not trying to sell anything, just contribuiting to the knowledge by explaining what the library is for. If you still think that I'm violating the rules, I would very much appreciate your advise. This is my first article in wikipedia and I do need some more experience. I'm more than willing to make any change to fulfill wikipedia rules. Thank you

Decline reason:

See Gb's comments below. You will not be unblocked under this username. If you really want to get it changed, you can suggest a new username with {{unblock-un|new username here}}, but it's a lot easier for everyone and works out better for you if you just log out and make a new account that meets our username policy. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, for a start, if you are involved with a company you have a conflict of interest which means you shouldn't really be creating or editing articles about that company. It's not just a question of whether the company has something to sell or not - it's a question of using Wikipedia to promote the company or organisation...that's a wider issue.

If you wish to contribute to areas where you don't have a conflict of interest, I'd suggest you just start a new account (avoiding incorporating the name of a company in it) - that way you have a clear block log - rather than unblocking this one. _Gb^T/c 12:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]