User talk:Nlwalker487

April 2024

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Graham Hancock, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. JaggedHamster (talk) 07:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gate keeper. Personal attacks is a lie. If you identified with having wikipedia's cum in your tummy that's your issue Nlwalker487 (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I did attack Wikipedia itself. But that's okay. They are in the wrong here Nlwalker487 (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nlwalker487 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The accusation is unfounded. Obviously I made an account to edit a page and then found out gatekeepers that think they are so cool have it locked. So I asked politely if a section could be removed. Not replaced. Removed. I barely got a response. I'm allowed to talk however I want so long as I'm not hurting anyone. You aren't my dad. Let me start my wikipedia editing hobby and stop gatekeeping. Nlwalker487 (talk) 17:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm allowed to talk however I want so long as I'm not hurting anyone – that might be true in some contexts, but it isn't when you are editing a collaborative encyclopaedia. It's pretty clear from your contributions before and after the block that the block is appropriate and necessary. Any continued name-calling or hostility is extremely likely to lose you access to your talk page. Note also that you are not allowed to create a new account, and doing so will end with that account getting blocked as well. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nlwalker487 (talk) 17:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's cool. I made a new account. Already started my editing journey! Thanks for showing how not to treat people