Jump to content

User talk:Noah Evander

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Community First Credit Union, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.communityfirst.com.au/default.asp?page=/about+community+first. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Community First Credit Union. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. MKoltnow 05:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Community First Credit Union has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Coredesat 07:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please do not delete, i am extremely outraged. How can someone be expected to write about something he is extremely passionate about without 1) stating some common statistics, some facts and figures which will of course be located on any company's website. and 2) how can anyone place these figures, statistics without unintentionally promoting the company and its products and 3) of course these facts are going to seem to be an advertsement, all wikipedia is in a way an advertsement, some sort of promotion and communication to a specific targeted audience in this case wikipedia users.

I have tried to make this as impartial as i can without trying to compromise the reputation of this organsation and compromisde the inforamtion people need to make decisions. The aim of an encyclopedia article is to inform and provide vital inforamtion, if i made it any broader then the information provided would be meaningless and of no use to any one, therefore destroying any initial intention of the article.