User talk:Notwisconsin

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catherine Parker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Representative.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Liz Truss, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arglebargle79 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arglebargle79. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 14:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is bullshit. Notwisconsin (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Notwisconsin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I was blocked the first time unfairly and unjustly. If you look at my last incarnation (and the first one), you will notice that I was blocked for linking parts of a number of articles about what would become the January 6 United States Capitol attack and saying that a riot was being planned. This was a legitimate addition to specific events that had already happened. I also believe that for a short time I had something up in the talk page saying something snarky about then-President Trump, which turned out to be right. Prior to that, I had actually gotten permission to create the previous sockpuppet from a number of high 'muckymucks" in the organization at a conference a number of years ago. I had objected to misinformation about the upcoming 2015 Canadian election. Under the laws at the time, (and apparently, they still apply), the election had to be called by a certain date, and they refused to believe it, assuming that the minority government of the time would vote to extend the length of the parliament's term, which didn't happen. A week after I was blocked for insisting that the election would be called in 2015, it was. The reason that I was blocked was due to my so-called arrogance. How was saying that a democratic government would obey the law arrogant? Also, why was it wrong to say that a major historical event, that was being broadcast all over the internet, was misinformation? I humbly ask: could you please unblock me? Notwisconsin (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I must admit that I have some difficulty parsing this request (which "first incarnation"? Permission to sock "from a number of high 'muckymucks'"?), but since it neither disputes that sockpuppetry has occured, nor addresses the reason for Arglebargle79's block (BLP violations), I am declining it. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.