User talk:Nut-meg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Iqinn (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Self Defense[edit]

Replied on your question on Talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Self-defense_(Sweden) Sebastiannielsen (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

DRV[edit]

I replied to your comment in the DRV. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Anita Hill[edit]

At Talk:Anita Hill#Politically Motivated Character Assassination?, a user (not me) repeated a claim he'd heard on two different legitimate television news programs and politely asked "Does anyone have any source material that either proves or disproves that assertion?" Two subsequent users provided source material with differing degrees of specificity. None of the three users expressed any opinion, except regarding the relevance of the sources.

Earlier today, you chime in with "The discussion page is for discussing the article, not for venting opinions". That seems to betray an extraordinary sensitivity regarding the Anita Hill matter. You were wrong to chastise the other three users (including myself); we had been quite correct to discuss the matter as and where we had. --68.195.234.154 (talk) 14:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually Nut-meg was quite right, the discussion was inappropriate for talk pages in general, and particularly for a WP:BLP as it's not clear what, if anything is proposed for the article from that discussion. Discussions in talk page should solely be about improving articles. Notably, most of your statements appear to be WP:Syn, some appear to be pure WP:OR (at least the info from the FEC isn't sourced to a reliable secondary source). The statements by the earlier user were no better of course. Nil Einne (talk) 18:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Saddlebackcater.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Saddlebackcater.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 20:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trouble with angels.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trouble with angels.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)