User talk:Obensel
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Wyoming/Architectural_History_(Fall_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Obensel, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Alexandra Krosley's Peer Review
[edit]The overall added content to this article is relevant and helps provide more information than there was previously for this Wikipedia article on the Abbotsford House. Although there is a lot of newly added information, I think the lead section of the article can be improved a bit. In this lead section, there are only a few sentences and it doesn’t seem to touch on any of the important information that will be explained in more detail later on in the article. After going through the Wikipedia training, it seems that the lead section of an article should almost be a summary without a ton of details so that the reader can look at the lead section and understand what the article will be about. I also think that the article for the Abbotsford House could still be more structured and could maybe use a few more headings. This could be more of a personal preference, but the article might be more organized and easier for readers to follow if there were more headings than just “Description” and “Miscellaneous”. However, for the most part, the newly added information that you contributed seemed to have balanced coverage and neutral content. Also, the resources used seem to be reliable and the information in the article itself is cited properly and is consistently cited throughout the article. It’s clear that the Wikipedia article for the Abbotsford House has been improved a lot by the editor and presents much more relevant and important information than before.Akrosley (talk) 00:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)