User talk:Officekocharyan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Officekocharyan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nanodance (talk) 13:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Robert Kocharyan. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nanodance (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Robert Kocharyan, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Nanodance (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletions[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Kocharyan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nanodance (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Kocharyan, you may be blocked from editing. Nanodance (talk) 12:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Robert Kocharyan. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Officekocharyan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know that we did something wrong and understand that , it is our mistake(our workpeople havn't seen your masseges about warnings and they didn't understand that they did something wrong) , I confirm that we in future won't do again. Please unblock our user and range IP, I assure they won't repeat again.
Thanks
Best Regards
Arthur Movsesyan
email:redacted

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your contribution history, and was unable to find evidence that unblocking this account would be good for the encyclopedia. In addition, Wikipedia doesn't permit shared accounts, so I can't unblock an account for use by multiple people. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Officekocharyan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes I undestand, this user is personal user, in our company many persons are working , except user was blocked IP range, nobody in our company can't use own user of wikipedia, if is not possible unblock this user, pls unblock IP range, because is not home , it is very big network.

Decline reason:

Any individual user who finds they have fallen foul of an autoblock can request an unblock. This is a better way of dealing with the problem than unblocking the IP, as that would negate the purpose of blocking this account. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.