User talk:Oktay karaduman

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khoy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khoy, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Khoy was changed by Oktay karaduman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8553 on 2016-07-14T21:31:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sehdir gavat fars kopoyoglu

Oh, before I forget; if you do that again (e.g. making such edits, reverting an anti-vandal bot, etc.), and/or insult others (as you did here ^), you'll be straightly blocked. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 17:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oktay karaduman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Feinoha ^Talk 21:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 22:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to one week for abusing multiple accounts. While you're blocked, you're not allowed to edit Wikipedia whatsoever. If you'd like to appeal your block, see the above message on how to do so. Further use of alternative accounts to continue making disruptive edits is likely to result in a long-term block. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]