Jump to content

User talk:Oktocalok

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2023

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 20:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As no one has educated you

[edit]

about WP:EDITWARring, I guess I will. Not just edit warring. Maybe assuming good faith and not casting WP:ASPERSIONS, as you did on the article talk page. Instead of making up ridiculous personal attacks, as you did, it would be better to use the talk page to discuss content and sourcing. The nonsense you wrote on that talk page merited an indefinite block. So, please control yourself. I'll lay the standard template below for you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been engaged in an edit war. This means that you were repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #70226 cross post as a point of reference

[edit]

is closed.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]