User talk:Omoproject

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. The company's claim for notability rests on one product. Although you gave references, they seemed to be general reports based on what the company claims in press releaeses or its website, rather than peer-reviewed medical or scientific journals. The only ref that comes close to scientific says "very little information about VetiGel is available outside Suneris’ website and various news stories about the technology. Landolina and Suneris, a private company, are keeping many details about the material from the public for now, to safeguard their intellectual property.". Looks a bit premature to me to post this now, we are not a news page
• Although the article purports to be about the company, it's actually all about the product. I can't see that the company has any claim to notability beyond one unapproved product.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your text is all about what the company is trying to sell, yet relies on non-medical sources that appear to be parroting company claims

Perhaps you should be writing about the treatment rather than the company, but either way it seems a bit early to post yet. Nevertheless, if you want to try to improve the article, I can restore it in user space Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)