User talk:Onorem/Archive 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Lidz talk speech

The comments by the self-described paid publicist for Lidz have considerable explanatory value about the operations of what I'd previously thought was a self-respecting publisher, and they're certainly about the article. So please revert yourself and let them stand. (If you think that I, as coperpetrator of the despamming -- or desecration? -- of the article am in any way offended, you're very wrong. If anything, this kind of indignation amuses me.) -- Hoary (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

The commentary might be related to the article, but it certainly doesn't appear to be related to improving the article. Calling those that have recently worked to improve (by beginning to remove the obvious promotional material) the article monkeys has nothing to do with article improvement. Hearing the insulting feedback of the subject's publisher has nothing to do with article improvement. I don't see anything constructive in the comments I removed. I have absolutely no intention of reverting myself. That said, I won't war with you if you feel like restoring the attacks and other worthless commentary. --OnoremDil 22:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I've put it back. The poster believes that it's related to the improvement of the article, and in a sense it is. You and I both know that he's completely mistaken, but deletion of the comment smacks of censorship. And I for one am entirely accustomed to being referred to as a chimpanzee or worse: this kind of thing again says much more about the writer than the target. -- Hoary (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Censorship 3

Hey you guys! I guess you double dog dared me, cool. This is like the '60s, but without jail. First fun I have had at Wiki.

Just picked up my wife, and her laptop. I think I'm going to do some cut/paste from my Mac to the PC.

Busy weekend, will start Sat in Pilsen, Sun at Lincoln Cemetery in Ellwood. Lots of driving, lots of waiting. I'm sure I can figure out this wireless deal. Kids will help, before leaving for Vegas. I bet their hotel will be "wired", too.

Or. Someone in "cyberspace" could get real. Far less messy, I would think.

I'm going home now, later, venue to be decided. wm5200 posting on the lam.70.91.213.37 (talk) 22:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Your inability to understand the process despite dozens of people trying to explain it to you has absolutely nothing to do with censorship. I have no doubt that you'll be able to hop around various IPs. I also have no doubt that if you use them to continue your crusade, they will be swiftly reverted and blocked. Have fun wasting your time. It's not much work on this end. --OnoremDil 22:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

what's with everyone and emily on wordgirl being naked?

I have reverted edits saying that emily was seen without her clothes several times. I even went on their talk pages and said to them that that is unsourced, and that kids shows do not show naked girls. Why are they constently doing this, are they people who look at porn and use it where ever they feel like? Are they trying to make us think that wikipedia is vulnerable when it's not? What's going on with these editors, any ideas? N.I.M. (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: User:122.60.93.162

122.60.93.162 (talk · contribs) continues to add "A retarded 10 year old child can see what is happening" to Talk:United States diplomatic cables leak and its entire contribution history consists of personal attacks and trolling. I don't think attacking retarded children is acceptable. Viriditas (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

www.softpedia.com

I don't know how to communicate with you; what are u saying about the links cited are not sources. Why YOU DON'T GO TO www.softpedia.com and download and install Babylon translater, now I don't remember which one, if you search, on the first page if hits you get 3 or 4. Just install one or two of those and see what a nice trojan you get. It happened to me about 3 months ago, and THIS IS NOT PROOF THAT we have to warn users about that? And if you try to download something, how many clicks you make to get something... THAT IS NOT "Disguised Ads? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeepInternetSafe&Clean (talkcontribs)

I don't care if your comments are true. There has to be a reliable source for it. (I don't keep linking that for no reason) --OnoremDil 15:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:SYNTH

Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources. This would be a synthesis of published material to advance a new position, which is original research.[1] "A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published the same argument in relation to the topic of the article.

The individual statements are sourced in relation to the topic. The statements are separate sentences. Each individual statement is not combined to reach a conclusion not stated in the source. There is no conclusion C. The sentences are not joined together. I understand the way it was written before it could of been perceived as SYN. After reading SYN again I think there is no SYN in the Larry Sanger page. QuackGuru (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

I still completely disagree on the synth point. You are making a comparison that isn't supported by a single source. Also, after further thought...why is this on Sanger's page at all? Any reliably sourced discussion comparing the websites would belong on the articles for the sites. This seems a bit undue. --OnoremDil 06:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
According to SYN the text is not making a comparison to reach a conclusion C. Sanger and some of the sources do make a comparison anyhow. QuackGuru (talk) 06:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Softpedia for deletion

The article Softpedia is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softpedia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I have been acting imature

I can be a troll, and I'll stop. But the page for robot arena 2: design and destroy keeps getting messed up. Someone is removing official content and marking it as "fancruft." I plan on making myself here usful in computer/robotics pages ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.234.132 (talk)

Yes

There is a robot arena wiki, do you mind if we link to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sypher878 (talkcontribs)

I would assume that would be a reasonable external link, especially if it prevented you from edit warring over the unsourced fancruft. --OnoremDil 03:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
/shrug...looks like WP:EL disagrees. I thought that it would be an ok link, but understand why it would require a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. --OnoremDil 03:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

It does

The RA2 wiki is the best source of info out there. It has information on the games glitches and bots, made by there creators. And it is also locked to edit, unless you have an acount that has been varified by the forum admins. I guess if the wokopodo disagrees then we can just leave it off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sypher878 (talkcontribs)


listen

You need to go down to the store on your cloud of awwsomeness, pick up a copy of RA2, and play it before you tell ME what's in it. THAT ENTIRE LIST of robot was THE COMPUTER CONTROLLED BOTS from RA2. Get your stuff strait for crying out loud. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.234.132 (talk)

WP:OR and WP:VERIFY. --OnoremDil 13:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Jimbo Wales

Oops! Thanks for pointing that out. I thought that the banned user had written the "One editor has declined to compromise ..." comment as well as the comment about not being able to donate. It seemed that way from the sigs when I checked out the page yesterday. With hindsight that seems a bit daft, but oh well. Graham87 06:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy new year to you too. Graham87 08:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

yo

how you gonna say i did vandalism that dude is the real deal he is legit i'm tryina compliment him that ain't vandalism for real.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.49.128 (talk)

Cool story bro. --OnoremDil 05:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


Thanks

Thanks, 2 complex process for old timers.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Moonshine & Other Memory Burns

If an album's by a redlink artist, it can be speedy deleted via {{db-album}}. Same goes for songs, {{db-song}}. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Scarmudgeon

I happened across the edit war involving Scarmudgeon. I've had dealings with this editor who I suspected was a sock puppet of User:Aaron boucher: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scarmudgeon/Archive. The case was closed for lack of evidence but for what it's worth, User:Aaron boucher claimed that Scarmudgeon was his wife but now it appears that Boucher is using the Scarmudgeon account (as I suspect he was all along). Not sure if you're aware of all this. I'd actually forgotten about this editor/sock until I saw the 3RR notice. There's also the article on Aaron Boucher which is probably created by Boucher or his wife. Just to let you know since you are now dealing with him. As you can see from his comments, he's quite the charmer. freshacconci talktalk 19:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I hope that I'm not "dealing" with him. I'd rather be done. Seems mostly like the kind of stuff you can get away with if you take long enough breaks. I don't see it ending well if the edit warring starts up again in 46 hours. --OnoremDil 19:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to scare you out of bed!

[walks into Onorem's bedroom, making furnace noises through snuffle] f-f-f-f-f-f-f [in a normal voice] Get out of bed! [pokes Onorem with snuffle, Onorem jumps out of bed] --Vampire Snuffleupagus (talk) 15:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Go find something productive to do. --OnoremDil 15:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Vampire Snuffleupagus

Could you please ask the above account to stop with the vandalism edits (especially on talk pages)? The user has done it several times and hasn't stopped. I left my oats on your desk. - Sir Pawridge (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Leaving stupid messages is annoying, but it isn't vandalism. They'll wind up blocked soon enough if they continue the nonsense without contributing anything productive. --OnoremDil 16:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


Vikings vandalism

Thanks for fixing that up. I missed them because they were from a previous edit.Zoro 1234 20:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

i'll be damned

before I let you WHITE right wing wealthy TEA BAGGERS control the world; it already happened in the 1900s but it won't happen again never again will the many kneel down before the few for favors and table scraps i'll fuck u up if you try to mess with the will of the public fuck u, fuck ur ancestors, fuck ur children u rich WHITE SLAVEHOLDER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.124.143.222 (talk)

Sounds good. I hope you enjoy your block in the meantime. --OnoremDil 02:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

i'll be damned before I let you WHITE right wing wealthy TEA BAGGERS control the world

it already happened in the 1900s but it won't happen again never again will the many kneel down before the few for favors and table scraps i'll mess u up if you try to mess with the will of the public fk u, fk ur ancestors, fk ur children u rich WHITE SLAVEHOLDER FK U WHITE REPUBLICANS (in the case u are black) U should be ashamed u supremecist asshole for siding with the white people. This guys grandfather probably spat and fked ur grandmother in the cotton fields. IF U ARE BLACK AND A REPUBLICAN GO FK URSELF U MOTHER FKING retard U ARE THE EMBODIMENT OF EVERTYHING THat is wrong with our society. U ARE NOT WHITE, no matter how many wine tasting events and charity dinners u go to, u will still be the black fker to all the white people. SO IN CASE U are COLORED STOP!!! stop helping the whites, stop voting republican and right wing, stop attacking the poor and defenseless. GO JOIN OBAMA AND THE NEED FOR change. U JUST MADE A BIG MISTAKE MUTHER FKER; i'm gonna rape the tar out of ur account for fking w/ me stupid jew. I'm gonna fking terrorize u like the whites did to the blacks during the 1840s. HOPE U COMMIT SUICIDE cause u can't handle it u mother fking republican t-bag. ((In the case you are democratically inclined feel free to shoot me an email and I will leave u the alone, if not i will go on every ip address i can find in my college campus/small town and fk the living tar out of u)) email is (seriously): dumbasssrepublicans@yahoo.com or republicansareevil@rocketmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.57.168 (talk)

Oh noes. --OnoremDil 02:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

SANDY FIELDS

Sir,I'm contacting regarding Sandy Fields,who is a very skill basketball player.Sandy has beaten the odds coming from a small community and University.He has work his way up from the bottom of the basketball ranks.He will play in a WBA this summer for film purpose only and has an opportunity to play in Europe for the 2011-12 season.He is well known in the basketball fraternity.He is respected by Hall of Fame players.I ask that you please allow me to continue following Sandy Fields career and adding information as he continue to make his mark in the basketball world via Wikipedia.I follow Sandy's career closely and honor his will to not give up or allow others to determine his value as player.Enclosing,please sir remove do not remove this work in progress.We are sending teams to this sight asa professional bio. Again,thank your time and please watch Sandy's career climbing steadily to elite levels of professional basketball. Professionally, Theo Jeffries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo Jeffries (talkcontribs)

I was unable to find reliable secondary sources that verify that this person is notable. I do not think his current achievements meet the guideline at this time. If you have sources to offer, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Fields. --OnoremDil 20:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

We are not Saying he is NBA level,but will play at a high level in Europe this fall..They are article of European players alone,with no NBA on resume...Please reconsider,I put alot work into this and Sandy will more than represent Wikipedia.Eurobasket is one of the most reliable sources dealing with basketball.You make your decision on wikipedia and Sandy will make his mark in Europe..thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo Jeffries (talkcontribs)

I'm not saying that he needs to be a NBA level player. There needs to be independent sources that discuss him, and I wasn't able to find any. Also, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. What he will or will not do this fall is yet to be determined. --OnoremDil 20:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks much!

Thanks so much for getting involved in my block, I really appreciate it. Every user who gets blocked thinks they've been hard done to, but seeing others get involved to say the same thing, is incredibly gratifying. Blessings, - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 01:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Julius Malema

I had a look at the edits that cut about half the article. In my view they were well justified, and if I could justify spending the time and trouble, I would have done much the same. The problem we have is that the subject of this article is a very controversial figure, but only his detractors are active on Wikipedia. The result is that a huge quantity of minutiae get posted, all of it derogatory, and nobody ever takes issue with it. There is some discussion about that on his talk page. By the way, I am not a fan of Julius Malema by any means, and if it were up to me, the article would probably be as biased as it is. I just think that all these little petty factoids make the case against him weaker, not stronger. pietopper (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I won't revert again...and wouldn't have in the first place if I hadn't missed that a user who had renewed the discussion on the talk page was accidentally logged out for the edit. I checked the IP's contribs and thought it was a drive-by whitewashing of the article. I still don't think that such broad blanking is justified, but I really don't care about the subject much one way or the other. --OnoremDil 20:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting supertr0lls vandalism on my userpage. 43?9enter (talk) 05:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Ditto re. another. RashersTierney (talk) 23:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Yahoo

You were right on top of me that time! I would have bet money that was vandalism, but I took a look at the original entry. Sorry, you were absolutely right. Very impressive user page. Thank you for all your contribs. Many experienced editors seem to be backing away due to friction and/or frustration, or whatever. Good luck to you, and good editing. Ragityman (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Grupo Marrano

Hi there. Back in 2007, you tagged this article with the {{notability}} template. I agree with you that it is non-notable, and have proposed it for deletion. Robofish (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

San Pedro, Los Angeles

Hi there, I wanted to let you know that I just happened to come across the San Pedro, Los Angeles article and seen your edit summary regarding the external links. I took a look at them all and removed those that didn't look to belong (businesses, local blogs etc.) A number were for the City of Los Angeles in general, or even just southern California, and not directly specific to the subject. It's posible I could have removed more, but wasn't sure on some them, however the list now looks less like a directory. Cmr08 (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd forgotten completely about going back to take another look at the section. It looks much better than it did a couple months ago. --OnoremDil 13:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

You can remove block notices while the relevant block is in effect now?

At User talk:Chelo61 you removed an active block notice. Yet as far as I am aware you cannot remove block notices while the relevant block is in effect. Just to be clear: I am not asking you to reinstate the block notice and I won't be either; I just want some clarification on this. By the way: I was once told off for removing a block notice after a block had expired (The user who told me off thought my block was still active so they thought I was removing an active block notice and told me off for it).

Again: I just want some clarification as to why you removed the active block notice. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 22:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Onorem. You have new messages at Barts1a's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 01:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Onorem. You have new messages at Barts1a's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 03:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Undelete Images Need Help

Need Help undeleting photos discussed on my talk page

Those photographs were valuable, historic evidence that documented an incredibly dynamic environment that is home to critically endangered species such as the Kemp's ridley Sea Turtle and the Perdido Key beach mouse whose numbers were down to 40 individuals at one recent point in history. Had they not been deleted they would have been used to compare to current photos in order to document and understand how the sand dunes on this unique barrier island form and change over time, how the dunes are used and effected by native species and humans and how we can better protect these CRITICALLY ENDANGERED SPECIES. Joey Eads (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but I doubt you'll find much help in getting the images undeleted. They were apparently copyrighted by Google Earth and Panoramio. That you think they were valuable doesn't mean that Wikipedia should host copyright images with false licenses. If you wanted to maintain a copy of them for personal use, you should have done so on your own computer. If you are arguing that the images copyright actually belongs to you, then you'll have to provide evidence of that. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information. --OnoremDil 18:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

The photos on Panoramio and Google Earth are of the same area but are not the same images. I personally took the photos and I personally released them under unrestricted usage license according to the rules on Wikipedia well before any images of the area appeared on Google Earth. Wikipedia previous versions/archives serve as sufficient proof of this egregious error and that the photos were indeed mine before releasing them to Wikipedia according to Wikipedia rules for doing so. Please see WP:IAR and the 5 pillars of Wikipedia if you are at all unsure about difference between the letter of the rules and the spirit of the rules.Wikipedia:Five pillars Joey Eads (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

People who actually add new content, start new articles and add relevant information to the Wikipedia shouldn't be hindered by people who do not or can not. Admins should be able to tell the difference between beneficial edits and contributions from vandalism shrouded in pedantic enforcement of 'the rules' ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joey Eads (talkcontribs)

I'm willing to accept that an error has taken place, but IAR and the 5 pillars have absolutely nothing to do with this. The images were deleted because they were thought to be copyright violations. IAR wouldn't have applied in that situation. I can't see the images or their old descriptions, but I notice in another discussion that it says the image descriptions mentioned they were on Google Earth and Panoramio. If you added those descriptions when you uploaded them, that would seems to contradict that it's just the same area but not the same images. Perhaps a message on the deleting admin's talk page explaining the situation could convince them to take another look...though I'd suggest restricting the discussion to Wikipedia policies and not what creatures may or may not live because of an images deletion. --OnoremDil 19:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Plea for stipulation

I understood we have issue and I will discuss gladly with you. What is bothering you , Sir? Thank you for the correspondence and gladful day . --Shuvuhikovsky (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Disagree

I can wish to disagree, SIR. This behaviour of mine is one to be not argued. The people of Republic of Belaurus need approval for English speakers for articles. I work for Belaurus government so therefore agreement is to be tabled shortly with Wikipedia and Republic of Belaurus for permission. So please SIR, let me carry on my business and this sort of legislation will be not null and devoid. Thank you SIR. --Shuvuhikovsky (talk) 00:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Another time..

it might be a good idea to check what is going on before deciding to revert as something not being a good reason! [1]. Luckily there was no harm done, as the file had been replaced by the time you reverted, and in fact I was busy restoring the image myself. --Slp1 (talk) 00:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Bernard Finnigan

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bernard Finnigan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crows Forever (talk) 12:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Please look up WP:VANDALISM. Your reverts and warnings are not appropriate. I'd be happy to have any admin review my edits. --OnoremDil 12:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Ermysted's Grammar School

Please refrain from making dull edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ermysted's Grammar School. Your edits appear to constitute a lack of a sense of humour, and have been collared by the Sense of Humour Police or removed. If you would like to purchase a sense of humour, please visit the relevant aisle in Tesco. Thank you. 131.111.185.68 (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Yawn. --OnoremDil 19:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Removing a little bit of humour is, of course, a better use of time than overhauling an article of which half is glowing (albeit appallingly formatted) panegyric presumably written by the headmaster in his tea break, with the other half hopelessly out of date? Having said this it does give me no small comfort to see that a small part of my quasi-vandalism still survives, though! 131.111.185.68 (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, of course!

Yes, I've been trying to do that. I'm a new user and felt policed as soon as I came on here with these fancy notices he was using so I did ask him to stop but he di'nt.

Thanks.

PoliMasterTalk

how can you leave a message on my page; its not fair, why should I be neutral when I am poor. THE POOR ARE ALWAYS IN NEED OF HELP, i can't afford to be neutral

If I am neutral then I risk falling in line with the Tea Party (because they are as neutral as they get right). I just what all of us to get along without arguing, I don't hate people, I just want people to help each other out and appreciate life. I really don't hate people, i don't. I just want all of us to be happy, not just a select few. Do you get where i'm coming from???Puglover123 (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I have absolutely no idea where you are coming from. If you can't be neutral, then you might want to rethink which websites you choose to contribute to. --OnoremDil 16:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

International Space Station

Thank you

I just wanted to say thank you for your help, but looking at your page it looks out of place, may I say How DARE you HELP me FIX my SPELLING AND GRAMMAR, THAT IS HELPFUL behavior and I'll PUT UP WITH it just as long as you want to DISH IT OUT OK?????

It happens when I am not patient enough for the enhanced editor to load, and have already started typing away. Penyulap talk 19:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Who are you?

Why did you write on my page? 94.10.127.50 (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm me...and I left you a warning because you, or someone else from that IP, recently vandalized another user's page. Hope that helps. --OnoremDil 21:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

aslongasTOPDOWNWMFkepsDESPISINEDITORSnnutin=evergonachang

nukansavurbrethreWALEShe=donatnsEMBZLINDISABLDPERSECUTIN+ATAKINJERK-sven

Sorry to see that you're still having a hard time around here. I do disagree in general with your comments though. --OnoremDil 13:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

ididntstart-genuinlyCIVILsociety[2wichWMF'dbelong]ACOMODATSDISABLD-her,imjusaPUNCHINBAg-wel,iwontgodownw/outafite,norhasitbenMYchois.ta4urhelp[refers2PAST-adedkomnt]aforum4disabld~etnikNAHnotevnconsidrd-ther'dbenovolunters4dad-wmfBSdeydundeservgetinalthosdonatns2LITRALYBAILMOUTPRISON,butasaid,findavoisasadisabldprsn[orspendadayi/welchair,havfun.nfindinsum1toactas'sekretary,wakup rem,idusntfunktndadway[notdadivntrydheri/tw,itsELFISHheruno,elpinothers,nah.igoi/pcshop2inquir4newpc,anser'nxtdor=othrpcshop,ask'm-buti/tw[ivben2media/guvmnt4dad]thr=NODISCR.eithru,dey'dbrotherw/wmfjerks'nomalisatributn-igetAGF,butitaks22TANGO-idvtoputupw/blokaftrblok4sthdad'DNCANBESOLVDI/2WKS,pl-outsidofOT~givmakikbaki/theirtethsodeynohowitfels,ivnoptnsleft,ivbentoEACHNEVRYLEVLOFWMF[butheycantgetadisability,deyrMENTALYCHALENGDpresumably-asunoivSTRUGLD2GETVOISRECupnrunin,nhad2abandon-wothasWMFdun4me,or95%哦ofdeUTRIMATUREJERKSdadpopulatdisminiunivers??butheEDITSDROP,BUHUiveditedMORthanmosther,w/greatconstraints,butSMAKINPPL~MEINDAFACE=formher,ndenther=baklash,deyreapwotheysow,,mornot.deyevnATAKDMYHOTMAIL,wot=criminel,butheywmf=abuvdelaw-deythink[floridamustbelax,tho!sv

I think you're taking things too personally. It's difficult conversation for both sides. I hope they figure out a way to help eventually, and would still suggest that you find a friend to help to communicate your specific concerns in the meantime. I understand why people revert your comments when they don't know the background of the situation. It's not an excuse for them, but there are things you could do to help yourself instead of seeing insults where it's likely just confusion. Never attribute to malice what... If you're looking to make it a fight, please don't bother leaving messages for me here. Do what you need to do...but I'm not stepping on the WP:BATTLEGROUND. --OnoremDil 03:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

a40PPLETR2WMFhadj.wales ansr'..unfortunate..but=FAIR[DADURRXCLUDED'after4YRSdis=beinCALOUSi/dextrem,evnREFUSIN2getenundrstandin[ursamgod:'justypslower'[itsdeCUMULATISAMOUNTofkeystroke,butybothrey]-butoh,im2COMBATIV[notnededer~closdmouth]4beinASERTIV~mydisability,ys,civilsocietyalsoREMOVSLIMPINPPLFR.SIDWALK,HELTHYppl'vthings2douno.[ithankdu4be4,nthinkudeservdFB-inonb.givsafukher,actinhowdey'NOTDAREI/REGULARSOCIETY,but=CIVILher,ic.[1.TOLRANS2.ALOWVOISMSGS-itsaysTALKP,helooo,but4wmfjerksdadnotevnworthcontemplatin,EVRY1=EQUAL-myasfrankly-nubelong2dad2uno,byASOCIATN,jusasmuchasde'wiramnsnichtgewust'WO2germans.[nivXPLAINDw/bledinlysorhands2BELAFDAWAY,evnmyRSItemplatgotakndownbyNAZIADMINbasebalbugs,duntelmeits'confusn,dad=2IZInxcus,butrealy~baninwelchairusersofsidewalk,tothensaywe/theydidntnowhatheyrdoin,it=NOTabl.kindrgardnher,4YRSwmfknewotwasgoinon,uthinktheycontactedme[unleswen cc2guardian nsuch??uthinktheyevnonceALOWDME2USMYVOIS,LITERALY??o,butic,deynotfamiliarw/deteknoogy',ndenimLIVIDsurprise-notjus=aCOMODATINDEDISABLDnotaproirityher,it=2KEPMOUT-ivdunwoticanfr.myside,2faceDISKRIMINATORYHURDLs1aftranothr,,nxplain2pplwotsurprob,aftrugetoldw/asmile'jusleavmeamsg[BYTYPIN]onsuchnsuch,ivnotmad1objectibledit2daprojects,nowulukin2ur'patrolin[niceterm..]ntelmewotusersuprefr.

A polite note, for once

Onorem, you need a nice person posting on your talk page, and today, that's me. Wow, the abuse you get here is impressive. Here, have a breath of fresh air with my post.

I just added a new section to Talk:Sesame Street about your revert of yourself. You really should trust your instincts, so I reverted you back. You were right about the content not deserving its own section. Please read what I wrote and express your opinion about it. Also, keep up the good work here. Christine (talk) 17:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Block

That is exactly the point the editor was making. The item was posted before the IP was blocked so there is no reason to remove it. 78.146.213.194 (talk) 15:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

The person behind the IP was blocked prior to the post. "They" were just evading their block at the time. --OnoremDil 17:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Music composition

Hello Onorem. The only reason I edited those articles was because the Muscial notes to the two songs are so different. I didn't want a inaccurate post on the articles.

Fifa World cup

Dear Onorem, I have created the necessary blanko templates on my user pages. Could you insert my "edited" templates into those blanko ones, so that I, on my user subpage, get all my eight (to this date, six from A to F where F is the Portugal-Cameroon one) groups on my User Page. --Eu-151 (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Fifa World cup

Dear Onorem, I have created the necessary blanko templates on my user pages. Could you insert my "edited" templates into those blanko ones, so that I, on my user subpage, get all my eight (to this date, six from A to F where F is the Portugal-Cameroon one) groups on my User Page. --Eu-151 (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

  1. ^ Jimmy Wales has said of synthesized historical theories: "Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history." (Wales, Jimmy. "Original research", December 6, 2004)