User talk:Orifarm editor

February 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Secretlondon (talk) 17:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orifarm editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PurpleCowboyEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The aim of this account was to create a biographical page about Hans Bøgh-Sørensen, and does not intend to do so in a commercial manner. Given my username, I understand that I have been blocked because I draw lines between Hans Bøgh-Sørensen and the company he started, Orifarm. However, the intention of this account is not to promote Orifarm but instead to create a short description about Bøgh-Sørensen as he is a top business man in Denmark. If my blocking is withdrawn, I will change the parts of my article that can be perceived as advertisement, as advertisement is not my intention with the article. Going forward, I will treat my articles carefully, ensuring that my mistake does not happen again.

Decline reason:

This does not address your apparent violation of WP:COI. Frankly, you are not the person to write about Bøgh-Sørensen. If this is your only goal here, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 12:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hans Bøgh-Sørensen (February 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:BASIC. --

K.e.coffman (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]